/*
 * Copyright 2012-2025 the original author or authors.
 *
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 * You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 * https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
package org.assertj.core.error;

import static java.lang.String.format;
import static org.assertj.core.api.BDDAssertions.then;
import static org.assertj.core.configuration.ConfigurationProvider.CONFIGURATION_PROVIDER;
import static org.assertj.core.error.ShouldHaveStamp.shouldHaveStamp;

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicStampedReference;

import org.assertj.core.internal.TestDescription;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

class ShouldHaveStamp_create_Test {

  @Test
  void should_create_error_message() {
    // GIVEN
    AtomicStampedReference<String> actual = new AtomicStampedReference<>("foo", 1234);
    // WHEN
    String message = shouldHaveStamp(actual, 5678).create(new TestDescription("TEST"), CONFIGURATION_PROVIDER.representation());
    // THEN
    then(message).isEqualTo(format("[TEST] %n" +
                                   "Expecting%n" +
                                   "  AtomicStampedReference[stamp=1234, reference=\"foo\"]%n" +
                                   "to have stamp:%n" +
                                   "  5678%n" +
                                   "but had:%n" +
                                   "  1234"));
  }

}
